Introduction
Wearable technology has become an integral part of modern fitness enthusiasts. With the increasing demand, many brands now offer their version of fitness trackers, making it challenging for consumers to choose the best.
This article will compare two of the most popular fitness trackers: the Garmin Forerunner and the Polar M600. We will compare these devices' essential features, battery life, and ease of use.
Design and Display
The Forerunner and the M600 have a robust build and are suitable for outdoor activities. However, the Forerunner provides more customization options than the M600, with interchangeable straps and bezels allowing users to tailor the look of their watch to their liking.
Additionally, the Garmin Forerunner offers a better display resolution than the Polar M600. While the former has a 215 x 180-pixel resolution, the latter has a 240 x 240-pixel resolution screen.
Winner: Garmin Forerunner
Features
Both wearables come with similar fitness features, including an optical heart rate monitor, step tracking, and GPS. However, the Forerunner 945 offers advanced metrics such as VO2 max readings and training load analysis, making it an excellent choice for serious athletes.
Moreover, the Forerunner 945 offers superior battery life compared to the M600, with up to 36 hours in GPS mode and ten days in smartwatch mode. In contrast, the M600 offers 48 hours of battery life in smartwatch mode and only six hours in GPS mode.
Winner: Garmin Forerunner
Software Integration
Garmin offers an excellent smartwatch experience across its range of GPS sports watches. It offers a robust smartphone app (Garmin Connect) and is compatible with several popular third-party services, including Strava and MyFitnessPal.
While Polar has made improvements to the Polar Flow app, it still lacks behind the Garmin Connect app, which provides detailed and customizable data analytics for fitness enthusiasts.
Winner: Garmin Forerunner
Price
The price point of both wearables is relatively high, making them both a considerable investment for fitness enthusiasts. The Polar M600 is less expensive than the Garmin Forerunner, with a price tag of around $279, while the Forerunner is around $500, making it the more expensive option.
Winner: Polar M600
Conclusion
Both the Garmin Forerunner and the Polar M600 offer incredible fitness tracking features that allow users to stay on top of their health and fitness goals. However, the Garmin Forerunner emerges as the clear winner in this comparison, offering competitive benefits in essential areas such as battery life, display resolution, and software integration.
However, if you're on a tight budget, the Polar M600 may be an excellent choice for you, with a lower price than the Forerunner.
References: